Blogging gives you the opportunity to create relevant content for your customers to drive traffic back to your website.
Blogs increase your SEO and fresh and relevant content is the key to edging out your competitors in the search engine results pages and by using multiple blog engines to broadcast that fresh content you will increase That competitive advantage.
Well written articles will position your brand as an industry leader and posting topics that connect you with your market will demonstrate your knowledge of your business, service or product.
Blogs provide another way to develop better customer relationships by connecting directly with them on your website where your site visitors are able to get to know your business or product from the comfort of your online real estate.
Blogs improve SEO, attract and engage visitors and promote sales but success isn’t a singular idea. Instead it’s multi-faceted, with countless elements drawn together to attract the necessary clients. Letting just one blog dictate the tone, message and branding of your website is a mistake.
Having a multiple blog engine platform, each with its own search visibility, gives you a big advantage over the competition. Each of these blogs highlights an element of the company (such as sales events, product data and category topics). These elements are then offered SEO infused content, bolstering both their relevancy and their search engine rankings which is essential in today’s competitive landscape.
.Â
Through the social integration process, each of these blogs offers consistent content to the right networks. They contribute information that both entices and educates, encouraging readers to return again and again. This increases traffic and, more importantly, it increases sales
Social SEO (search engine optimization) shines a bright light back to your web platform, increasing your online visibility and connecting you to your entire target audience and beyond but even with a diligent blogging schedule, limiting your strategy to focus solely on site updates leaves you in the fog, invisible to your network of socially plugged-in customer base.
Automated integration of your blogs with multiple social networks enables your content to hit the sweet spot of the virtual world, instantly delivering your latest news to your customers via both search and social vectors while saving you valuable time.
Writing quality blog content is a great start toward running a successful blog, but the hard part is getting that content discovered and having the right technology to do it with is essential.
Your brand needs to be on point each and every day and blogs are a key component and to do this you must have the technology that will breath life into your brand.
A key component of any successful plan is the foundation on which it is built and provides the framework that is going to drive that success.
Â
Â
LinkedIn is the most recently added API not listed in this PDF along with the ability to post to over 300 Social sites.
Â
Â
When it comes to content marketing, the majority of business-to-business (B2B) marketers we surveyed last month are not as mature as they think.
Roughly half of respondents (52%) are in the early stages of assembling a content strategy and executing against it. We call this early majority "aspiring editors," and while their practices are often inconsistent or not fully embraced across the organization, these marketers are busy laying the foundation upon which to build an editorial point of view that gives their buyers something useful and valuable to read, watch, or interact with.Â
In a new report, published today (subscription required), we took a closer look at the maturity of content marketing practices among 113 B2B marketing professionals. Half of our respondents hail from companies with 1,000 employees or more, and 41% occupy senior marketing positions including the title of CMO or senior vice president. When compared to peers, most (51%) believe their practices are very mature. Â
But that bar is not very high when an overwhelming 85% can't connect content activity to business value and, as a result, fail to create those intimate long-term relationships that will form the primary source of competitive advantage in business from now on.
Our content marketing benchmark shows that B2B marketers have more work to do when it comes to consistently delivering a valuable exchange of information with prospects and customers. Key findings include:
To overcome these deficiencies, and others we detail in the report, CMOs will need to take a hard look at skills, staff, and creative resources directed at content production — because it's clear that staying the current course will not be productive long-term. In the survey, we found just 4% of those we surveyed are true masters of content marketing. We were lucky enough to speak to a few at companies like Computer Sciences Corp, Deltek, Kapost, Sungard Availability Services, and Verizon — you can learn more about their practices and successes in the research. Survey participants who are members of the Business Marketing Association or Online Marketing Institute can apply for a copy of the report here. You can also read the Advertising Age coverage here to get an additional perspective.
Next up? A deeper look at why content marketing needs to look beyond the top of the funnel to deliver more impact to the business. And, in August, I'll bring this content marketing insight together during theForrester Webinar "Four Ways To Improve Your Content Marketing Maturity" on August 7th.
In the meantime, let me know if you have any interesting content marketing successes to share. Take the assessment yourself and let me know how you score. I look forward to meeting more content masters who deliver the information and insight that buyers value and share.
Originally Posted on Forrester
The words “duplicate content penalty†strike fear in the hearts of marketers. People with no SEO experience use this phrase all the time. Most have never read Google’s guidelines on duplicate content. They just somehow assume that if something appears twice online, asteroids and locusts must be close behind.
This article is long overdue. Let’s bust some duplicate content myths.
Note: This article is about content and publishing, not technical SEO issues such as URL structure.
I have never seen any evidence that non-original content hurts a site’s ranking, except for one truly extreme case. Here’s what happened:
The day a new website went live, a very lazy PR firm copied the home page text and pasted it into a press release. They put it out on the wire services, immediately creating hundreds of versions of the home page content all over the web. Alarms went off at Google and the domain was manually blacklisted by a cranky Googler.
It was ugly. Since we were the web development company, we got blamed. We filed a reconsideration request and eventually the domain was re-indexed.
So what was the problem?
It’s easy to imagine how this got flagged as spam.
But this isn’t what people are talking about when they invoke the phrase “duplicate content.†They’re usually talking about 1,000 words on one page of a well-established site. It takes more than this to make red lights blink at Google.
Many sites, including some of the most popular blogs on the internet, frequently repost articles that first appeared somewhere else. They don’t expect this content to rank, but they also know it won’t hurt the credibility of their domain.
I know a blogger who carefully watches Google Webmaster Tools. When a scraper site copies one of his posts, he quickly disavows any links to his site. Clearly, he hasn’t read Google’s Duplicate Content Guidelines or the Guidelines for Disavows.
Ever seen the analytics for a big blog? Some sites get scraped ten times before breakfast. I’ve seen it in their trackback reports. Do you think they have a full-time team watching GWT and disavowing links all day? No. They don’t pay any attention to scrapers. They don’t fear duplicate content.
Scrapers don’t help or hurt you. Do you think that a little blog in Asia with no original writing and no visitors confuses Google? No. It just isn’t relevant.
Personally, I don’t mind scrapers one bit. They usually take the article verbatim, links and all. The fact that they take the links is a good reason to pay attention to internal linking. The links on the scraped version pass little or no authority, but you may get the occasional referral visit.
Tip: Report Scrapers that Outrank Your Site
On the (very) rare occasion that Google does get confused and the copied version of your content is outranking your original, Google wants to know about it. Here’s the fix. Tell them using the Scraper Report Tool.
Tip: Digitally Sign Your Content with Google Authorship
Getting your picture to appear in search results isn’t the only reason to use Google Authorship. It’s a way of signing your name to a piece of content, forever associating you as the author with the content.
With Authorship, each piece of content is connected to one and only one author and their corresponding “contributor to†blogs, no matter how many times it gets scraped.
Tip: Take Harsh Action against Actual Plagiarists
There is a big difference between scraped content and copyright infringement. Sometimes, a company will copy your content (or even your entire site) and claim the credit of creation.
Plagiarism is the practice of someone else taking your work and passing it off as their own. Scrapers aren’t doing this. But others will, signing their name to your work. It’s illegal, and it’s why you have a copyright symbol in your footer.
If it happens to you, you’ll be thinking about lawyers, not search engines.
There are several levels of appropriate response. Here’s a true story of a complete website ripoff and step-by-step instructions on what actions to take.
I do a lot of guest blogging. It’s unlikely that my usual audience sees all these guest posts, so it’s tempting to republish these guest posts on my own blog.
As a general rule, I prefer that the content on my own site be strictly original. But this comes from a desire to add value, not from the fear of a penalty.
Ever written for a big blog? I’ve guest posted on some big sites. Some actually encourage you to republish the post on your own site after a few weeks go by. They know that Google isn’t confused. In some cases, they may ask you to add a little HTML tag to the post…
Tip: Use rel=“canonical†Tag
Canonical is really just a fancy (almost biblical) word that means “official version.†If you ever republish an article that first appeared elsewhere, you can use the canonical tag to tell search engines where the original version appeared. It looks like this:
That’s it! Just add the tag and republish fearlessly.
Tip: Write the “Evil Twinâ€
If the original was a “how to†post, hold it up to a mirror and write the “how not to†post. Base it on the same concept and research, but use different examples and add more value. This “evil twin†post will be similar, but still original.
Not only will you avoid a penalty, but you may get an SEO benefit. Both of these posts rank on page one for “website navigation.â€
In my view, we’re living through a massive overreaction. For some, it’s a near panic. So, let’s take a deep breath and consider the following…
Googlebot visits most sites every day. If it finds a copied version of something a week later on another site, it knows where the original appeared. Googlebot doesn’t get angry and penalize. It moves on. That’s pretty much all you need to know.
Remember, Google has 2,000 math PhDs on staff. They build self-driving cars and computerized glasses. They are really, really good. Do you think they’ll ding a domain because they found a page of unoriginal text?
A huge percentage of the internet is duplicate content. Google knows this. They’ve been separating originals from copies since 1997, long before the phrase “duplicate content†became a buzzword in 2005.
When I talk to SEOs about duplicate content, I often ask if they have first-hand experience. Eventually, I met someone who did. As an experiment, he built a site and republished posts from everywhere, verbatim, and gradually some of them began to rank. Then along came Panda and his rank dropped.
Was this a penalty? Or did the site just drop into oblivion where it belongs? There’s a difference between a penalty (like the blacklisting mentioned above) and a correction that restores the proper order of things.
If anyone out there has actual examples or real evidence of penalties related to duplicate content, I’d love to hear ‘em.
About the Author: Andy Crestodina is the Strategic Director of Orbit Media, a web design company in Chicago. You can find Andy on Google+ and Twitter.
According to Crowdtap, partnered with Ipsos Media surveying 839 millennial men and women online, millennials reported spending roughly 18 hours of their day engaged with media, often viewing multiple devices simultaneously. Whether it’s called peer-created content, consumer content or user generated content (UGC), the research found that millennials spend 30% of their media consumption time with content that is created by their peers.
This exceeds television consumption and is rivaled only by the time spent with all traditional media types (TV, print, radio), a combined 33%. Millennials are also committed to engaging with social media on a daily basis above all other media types.
Millennials spend more time with User Generated Content than with TV
Share of Daily Media (All Media Types;17.8 hours) |
|
% of Time Spent |
Media |
20% |
Browse the internet / go online |
13% |
Watch TV (live) |
10% |
Watch TV (pre-recorded) |
10% |
Play computer or video games |
7% |
Go to the movies |
7% |
Listen to the radio |
3% |
Read print magazines / newspapers |
 |
|
Share of Daily Media Time (UGC; 5.4 hours) |
|
% of Time Spent |
Media  |
18% |
Social networking & content (FB, Instagram, LinkedIn) |
6% |
Use e-mail, text, chat, texting apps |
6% |
Talk with others about news / products /brands |
Source: Ipsos MediaCT/Crowdtap Jan 2014 |
Millennials prioritize social networking above other media:
Daily Use of Media Types |
|
Peer Generated |
 |
Format |
Use Daily |
Social Networking (eg. FB, LinkedIn, Inst...) |
71% |
E-mail, text, chat, texting apps |
49% |
Talk about products/brands |
39% |
Watch video clips (eg. YouTube) |
35% |
Read peer reviews (eg. epinions) |
18% |
Blog online, post to bulletin boards, etc. |
15% |
 |
|
Other Media |
 |
Watch TV (live) |
60% |
Listen to Radio (broadcast/streaming) |
53% |
Retrieve news, weather, scores |
47% |
Watch TV (pre-recorded) |
46% |
Visit news media sites |
37% |
Read blogs, bulletin boards, etc. |
29% |
Read print magazines or newspapers |
18% |
Get product info/buy from a company |
17% |
Read professional reviews (CNET, etc.) |
15% |
Banner ad |
12% |
Source: Ipsos MediaCT/Crowdtap Jan 2014 |
Given millennials’ advertising savvy and skepticism around media, it is important to deliver a message through trusted sources, says the report. Millennials report that information they receive through UGC is highly trustworthy and trusted 40% more than information they get from traditional media sources (TV, print & radio), including newspapers and magazines.
Specifically, conversations with friends and family are the most trusted UGC format, followed by peer reviews. Conversations with friends and family are trusted 2:1 over TV and radio and almost 4:1 over banner ads. Brands looking for consumers to trust their marketing can no longer rely on tradiÂtional media to communicate their messages to consumers. In today’s landscape, it’s peer-created content, or “consumer to consumer marketing,†that drives trust.
The correlation between trust and influence is revealed in the 2013 Annual Edelman Trust Barometer Study, says the report, which finds that trust leads to influence. The more trusted the source of a message, the more likely it will have a positive impact.
Media Trustworthiness (UGC 59%) |
|
Format |
% Most Trusted |
Product/brand conversations with friends/family |
74% |
Peer reviews (e.g., epinions) |
68% |
E-mail, text, chat with friends/family |
56% |
Social networking & content (FB, Instagram, LinkedIn) |
50% |
Blogs, bulletin boards, forums, etc. |
48% |
 |
|
Other media 39% |
 |
Professional/industry reviews (CNET, etc.) |
64% |
Product info/buy products from a co. website |
49% |
Print magazines or newspapers |
44% |
Online magazines or newspapers |
40% |
Radio |
37% |
On TV |
34% |
At the movies |
28% |
Banner ads |
19% |
Source: Ipsos MediaCT/Crowdtap Jan 2014 |
With 18 hours of media consumption a day, across multiple screens, with channel flipping, tabbing and page turning, it’s a wonder anything stands out and makes a lasting impression, notes the report. Marketers rely on creative to break through the clutter, but often it’s a combination of creative and the right delivery channel. For millennials, user generated content is more memorable than non-user generÂated content, with peer-created content, including conversations with friends/family and peer reviews standing out the most.
Percent Finding Media Type Memorable |
|
UCGÂ 50% |
 |
Media Type |
% Finding Memorable |
Professional/industry reviews (CNET, etc.) |
47% |
On TV |
47% |
Product info/buy products from a co. website |
42% |
Print magazines or newspapers |
38% |
At the movies |
37% |
Radio |
33% |
Online magazines or newspapers |
32% |
Banner ads |
26% |
 |
|
Other Media 37% |
 |
Product/brand conversations with friends/family |
67% |
Peer reviews (eg., epinions) |
53% |
Social networking & content (FB, Instagram, LinkedIn) |
50% |
E-mail, text, chat with friends/family |
46% |
Blogs, bulletin boards, forums, etc. |
40% |
Source: Ipsos MediaCT/Crowdtap Jan 2014 |
UGC uniquely provides marketers greater access to millennials’ time, a trusted channel to deliver brand messages and a memorable experience. The combination to deliver all three makes UGC more influential on millennials’ product choices and purchase decisions than traditional media.
Percent of millennials who say media type has influence on purchase decision:
Concluding, the report says that professional influencers have the reach and resources to create and share quality content. Consumer influencers have personal relationships that enable their recommendations to carry weight. Together, this combination can drive both reach and powerful influence. As brands continue to aggregate types of influencers and refine their strengths, these programs will likely become a fundamental component of most marketing strategies.
By Jack Loechner,
Center for media Research
What do E.T., Jimmy Kimmel, Mashable and The Washington Post have in common?
They all used native advertising.
Also known as sponsored content, native advertising allows businesses to include branded content that resembles journalistic content in a publication’s pages.
The paid content will never match the credibility and value of earned media, but it can still amplify earned or owned messages, according to Edelman Chief Content Strategist Steve Rubel.
In Steve’s Sponsored Content Report he breaks down the ins and outs of native advertising.
This article highlights Steve’s findings about why native advertising’s popularity has surged and how brands and publications use it.
Native advertising has existed in some form for decades.
Recently, though, major news publications that had once shunned branded content from its pages have become open to it.
Here are three reasons why:
It’s no secret that U.S. news media outlets need new sources of revenue.
Even since the beginning of 2013, advertising prices have dropped sharply because of increased content accessibility, fewer banner clicks due to increased mobile usage, and digital ad exchanges providing real-time ad inventory trading.
At the same time, few consumers have shown a willingness to pay for news.
Twitter and Facebook pioneered chronological news consumption with its layouts that include ads and personal content alongside editorial news.
People generally accept advertising in social networks (and search engines) because they understand that’s the cost of a free service.
Having paid, owned and earned content next to each other has potentially changed how audiences feel about “the permeability between advertising and editorial (e.g. the so-called church-state wall),†Steve writes.
Wrestling with native advertising? Register for Steve’s free webinar now!
Fifty-five percent of B2C content marketers said spending on content would increase over the next 12 months, according to a 2012 study.
The continued growth of content marketing—which allows marketers to tell their brand story on their own websites, mobile apps and social channels—creates stiff competition for prospects’ attention.
Marketers joining forces with news executives “may enable sponsored content to thrive,†Steve writes.
Just as content types differ, so do the types of native advertising. Steve’s research has show three common approaches.
Steve suggests that more forms of native advertising will emerge as the practice becomes more widespread, ethical dilemmas are resolved and publishers differentiate offerings.
Here are three of today’s most popular methods:
Currently the most common format, paid syndication places clearly labeled branded articles, videos, slideshows and infographics in the news section.
Paid syndication has potential pitfalls, though. Clearly labeling content as a “sponsored post†could drive readers away.
Other times, it can frustrate readers. In January 2013, The Atlantic published native advertising by The Church of Scientology and came under fire as its audience found it too self-serving. The backlash forced them to take down the article 11 hours later.
AOL, Slate, NBC News, and Gawker Media are some news outlets that run paid-syndicated posts.
Steve compared this tactic to TV product placement, where a publication weaves a brand into a narrative.
BuzzFeed, for example, uses this tactic by creating a post centered around a “sponsor’s ideals†with a brand message weaved in, Steve says.
Other publications will integrate native ads into posts but do so more overtly. For example, a top 10 list will have a sponsor listed as number 11.
The future of native advertising may be paid co-creation, Steve says. It has the potential to benefit readers, marketers and publishers while being “ethically safer.â€
With the tactic, a brand funds the development and staffing of a new site, news section or app. Though a marketing team guides the new platform’s direction, the publication typically controls the editorial content.
Mashable, for example, has teamed its content creators with marketers to develop a series of feature articles that relate to the brand’s values or themes.
Steve writes that native advertising continues to evolve and provides the PR industry an opportunity to expand its relationship with media outlets. However, unknowns, including solutions to ethical issues, remain.
The onus of resolving the pitfalls of native advertising does not belong to publishers only, though.
“The PR industry can play a key role in the development of this new advertising format,†Steve writes. “Experimentation should be encouraged. And just as the social media revolution expanded the profession’s remit, so may sponsored content – but perhaps in a much more profound and accelerated way.â€
BYÂ BRIAN CONLIN
© 2024 One Big Broadcast | All rights reserved